On 10/19/2016 6:26 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
>> -static int hidma_create_sysfs_entry(struct hidma_dev *dev, char *name,
>> > -                              int mode)
>> > +static int hidma_sysfs_uninit(struct hidma_dev *dev)
>> > +{
>> > +  if (!dev->chid_attrs)
>> > +          return -ENOMEM;
> why is this check required? Probe would fail in init case right.
> Second returning error doesnt help as you are calling this from remove and
> return is not checked so redundant!

Agreed, I'll get rid of the attrs and also the return value.

-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm 
Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux 
Foundation Collaborative Project.

Reply via email to