On Sun, 23 Oct 2016 23:45:46 +0200
Lukasz Majewski <l.majew...@majess.pl> wrote:
> The need for set_polarity() function has been removed by implementing
> PWM atomic support (apply() callback).
>
> To indicate that the PWMv2 supports polarity inversion, new flag -
> "polarity_supported" has been introduced.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majew...@majess.pl>
> ---
> drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
> index 02d3dfd..be3034d 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
> @@ -258,6 +258,7 @@ static struct pwm_ops imx_pwm_ops_v2 = {
> };
>
> struct imx_pwm_data {
> + bool polarity_supported;
> struct pwm_ops *pwm_ops;
> };
>
> @@ -266,6 +267,7 @@ static struct imx_pwm_data imx_pwm_data_v1 = {
> };
>
> static struct imx_pwm_data imx_pwm_data_v2 = {
> + .polarity_supported = true,
> .pwm_ops = &imx_pwm_ops_v2,
> };
>
> @@ -313,7 +315,7 @@ static int imx_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> imx->chip.base = -1;
> imx->chip.npwm = 1;
> imx->chip.can_sleep = true;
> - if (data->pwm_ops->set_polarity) {
> + if (data->polarity_supported) {
You're still breaking backward compatibility with DTs defining
#pwm-cells = 2.
Please test the #pwm-cells value before deciding which of_xlate should
be used.
> dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "PWM supports output inversion\n");
> imx->chip.of_xlate = of_pwm_xlate_with_flags;
> imx->chip.of_pwm_n_cells = 3;
