On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 06:11:41PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 02:24:21PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 05:00:11PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > > > > > I have a 4th Gen Core NUC where I experienced this issue. It reported > > > > > requiring only ACPI start but actually required ACPI + CRB start. The > > > > > comment could have been better. > > > > Shouldn't bios work arounds be keyed on something? What happens if a > > system rolls around that cannot do ACPI + CRB start? How does this > > system work in windows? > > I didn't find anything better to key it on at the time and it has been > working for two years now without any problems.
I've though about this and came to conclusion that maybe I won't apply this patch because it is good to keep this robustness in for now. I think your point is valid. /Jarkko
