Jiri Kosina <ji...@kernel.org> writes: > On Fri, 23 Sep 2016, Jessica Yu wrote: > >> Hm, quick question, which tree would this patch go to? Though the >> cleanup is for modules, there is an indirect cross-tree dependency >> (taint_flag.module needs to be true for TAINT_LIVEPATCH for Josh's >> patch to still work as intended). The least complicated thing to do >> would be to just take this through the livepatch tree (with Rusty's >> approval :-)), no? > > I don't want to be sneaking this behind Rusty's back, but he hasn't > reposnded so far.
I finally side-stepped this by appointing Jessica maintainer, thus her Reviewed-by is sufficient for the module tree. Lazy, huh? Sorry for the delay, Rusty. > It's not vitally super-crucial to have this present in this very pull > request, so I am currently putting this on hold wrt. the upcoming merge > window pull request, and we'll then proceeed afterwards once Rusty > expressess his (n)ack. If this doesn't happen during the coming weeks, > I'll pick this up myself. > > Thanks, > > -- > Jiri Kosina > SUSE Labs
