On Wed 26-10-16 08:59:52, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 12:36:09AM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> > In hva_to_pfn_slow() we are able to replace __get_user_pages_unlocked() with
> > get_user_pages_unlocked() since we can now pass gup_flags.
> >
> > In async_pf_execute() we need to pass different tsk, mm arguments so
> > get_user_pages_remote() is the sane replacement here (having added manual
> > acquisition and release of mmap_sem.)
> >
> > Since we pass a NULL pages parameter the subsequent call to
> > __get_user_pages_locked() will have previously bailed any attempt at
> > VM_FAULT_RETRY, so we do not change this behaviour by using
> > get_user_pages_remote() which does not invoke VM_FAULT_RETRY logic at all.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoa...@gmail.com>
>
> Note that the use of get_user_pages_remote() in async_pf_execute()
> reintroduces
> the use of the FOLL_TOUCH flag - I don't think this is a problem as this flag
> was dropped by 1e987790 ("mm/gup: Introduce get_user_pages_remote()") which
> states 'Without protection keys, this patch should not change any behavior',
> so
> I don't think this was intentional.
Yes, I have already mentioned this in one of my previous emails. This
indeed doesn't seem to be intentional
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
