4.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: Paulo Zanoni <[email protected]> commit 17777d61f4a87d7b6d5585e8fdffa83773c594e7 upstream. According to BSpec, it's the "core CPUs" that need the code, which means SKL and KBL, but not BXT. I don't have a KBL to test this patch on it. v2: Only SKL should have I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED. Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <[email protected]> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected] (cherry picked from commit 6e3100ec21e7c774a0fc01e36a1e0739530c2f71) Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 14 ++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c @@ -2881,8 +2881,14 @@ skl_wm_plane_id(const struct intel_plane static bool intel_has_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) { - return IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) && - dev_priv->sagv_status != I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED; + if (IS_KABYLAKE(dev_priv)) + return true; + + if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) && + dev_priv->sagv_status != I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED) + return true; + + return false; } /* @@ -2920,7 +2926,7 @@ intel_enable_sagv(struct drm_i915_privat * Some skl systems, pre-release machines in particular, * don't actually have an SAGV. */ - if (ret == -ENXIO) { + if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) && ret == -ENXIO) { DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("No SAGV found on system, ignoring\n"); dev_priv->sagv_status = I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED; return 0; @@ -2974,7 +2980,7 @@ intel_disable_sagv(struct drm_i915_priva * Some skl systems, pre-release machines in particular, * don't actually have an SAGV. */ - if (result == -ENXIO) { + if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) && result == -ENXIO) { DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("No SAGV found on system, ignoring\n"); dev_priv->sagv_status = I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED; return 0;
