On Fri 04-11-16 03:01:31, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> fix a typo
>
> On (11/04/16 02:31), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> [..]
> > #4 console semaphore
> > discussion outcome:
> > we agreed that we can do better here and that it makes sense to do
> ^^^^ IOW, console semaphore thing
> can be improved
>
> > what's been proposed in my slides. but, I keep it as a low priority.
> > frankly. I'd be happy to see #1-#3 in the mainline in 9-12 months.
> ^^^^ #1-#2, of course. but #1 consists
> of 2 steps.
>
> I'm still not entirely sure if I want to split async pintk and printk
> deadlock rework. these things want to come together, for a number of
> reasons. or, at least, push the async printk before printk deadlock
> rework.
Yep, please push async printk patches soon. IMHO there's no reason to wait
with that. You can create a git tree with printk patches and push it directly
to Linus since he seems to be fine with the approach...
Honza
--
Jan Kara <[email protected]>
SUSE Labs, CR
