On 04-11-16, 09:55, Markus Mayer wrote:
> From: Markus Mayer <mma...@broadcom.com>
> 
> With the new attribute type, it is possible to create write-only
> CPUfreq attributes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Mayer <mma...@broadcom.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/cpufreq.h | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> index 5fa55fc..ed09930 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> @@ -234,6 +234,10 @@ __ATTR(_name, _perm, show_##_name, NULL)
>  static struct freq_attr _name =                      \
>  __ATTR(_name, 0644, show_##_name, store_##_name)
>  
> +#define cpufreq_freq_attr_wr_perm(_name, _perm)      \

shouldn't this be _wo_perm ?

Also, I wouldn't mind doing this in the second patch itself.

> +static struct freq_attr _name =                      \
> +__ATTR(_name, _perm, NULL, store_##_name)
> +
>  struct global_attr {
>       struct attribute attr;
>       ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj,
> -- 
> 2.7.4

-- 
viresh

Reply via email to