On 2016.11.09 at 10:10 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 04:10:23PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf escreveu: > > On 2016.11.09 at 00:05 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:43 PM, Markus Trippelsdorf > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 2016.11.08 at 22:08 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > > > >> This patches fix problems in hierarchy output Markus reported some > > > >> time ago. The code is available on the 'perf/hierarchy-fix-v1' branch > > > >> in my tree: > > > > >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/namhyung/linux-perf.git > > > > >> Any feedbacks are welcomed. > > > > > By the way, I hope that: > > > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git/commit/?h=perf/core&id=8a06b0be6507f97f3aa92ca814335b8b65fd3de2 > > > > doesn't fall through the cracks. > > > > What do you mean? It's already in the tip/perf/core so will be merged > > > to the mainline eventually. > > > Ok. I was just wondering, because it sits there for two weeks already... > > If you think something qualifies for perf/urgent, i.e. to go to a kernel > that is in -rc stage, v4.9-rc4 now, for instance, please point that out > and I'll consider it.
Because "perf top --hierarchy" is new in 4.9, I think all fixes for that feature qualify for perf/urgent by default. -- Markus
