3.16.39-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <[email protected]>

commit 1245800c0f96eb6ebb368593e251d66c01e61022 upstream.

The iter->seq can be reset outside the protection of the mutex. So can
reading of user data. Move the mutex up to the beginning of the function.

Fixes: d7350c3f45694 ("tracing/core: make the read callbacks reentrants")
Reported-by: Al Viro <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
[bwh: Backported to 3.16: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <[email protected]>
---
 kernel/trace/trace.c | 15 ++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
@@ -4435,13 +4435,6 @@ tracing_read_pipe(struct file *filp, cha
        struct trace_array *tr = iter->tr;
        ssize_t sret;
 
-       /* return any leftover data */
-       sret = trace_seq_to_user(&iter->seq, ubuf, cnt);
-       if (sret != -EBUSY)
-               return sret;
-
-       trace_seq_init(&iter->seq);
-
        /* copy the tracer to avoid using a global lock all around */
        mutex_lock(&trace_types_lock);
        if (unlikely(iter->trace->name != tr->current_trace->name))
@@ -4454,6 +4447,14 @@ tracing_read_pipe(struct file *filp, cha
         * is protected.
         */
        mutex_lock(&iter->mutex);
+
+       /* return any leftover data */
+       sret = trace_seq_to_user(&iter->seq, ubuf, cnt);
+       if (sret != -EBUSY)
+               goto out;
+
+       trace_seq_init(&iter->seq);
+
        if (iter->trace->read) {
                sret = iter->trace->read(iter, filp, ubuf, cnt, ppos);
                if (sret)

Reply via email to