and you don't get the "RTNL: assertion failed at
devinet.c(775):inetdev_event" in 2.4.x ?
the thing is I need to prevent Tx/Rx when a topology change is initiated
from the ioctl (registering a virtual adapter is just one example), so they
all share a single lock and I must use spin_lock_bh from the ioctl.
Shmulik.
-----Original Message-----
From: Olaf Titz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 2:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: catch 22 - porting net driver from 2.2 to 2.4
> We figured that since we are in user context (do_ioctl) and use
> spin_lock_bh() to protect us from other concurrent threads, it might
> interfere with rtnl_lock() so we remove our lock just before calling
> register_netdev() and lock again upon return but then the whole process
just
> stopped and didn't return to the prompt. from within kdb, we could see
that
Can't you just do this:
#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(2,3,0) /* not sure about the 0 */
#define rtnl_LOCK() rtnl_lock()
#define rtnl_UNLOCK() rtnl_unlock()
#else
#define rtnl_LOCK() /* nop */
#define rtnl_UNLOCK() /* nop */
#endif
rtnl_LOCK();
register_netdevice(...);
rtnl_UNLOCK();
that works for me (yes, from do_ioctl, but without the bh lock - I
don't know if that's absolutely needed in your case).
Olaf
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
