4.8-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>

commit faead41cc7213ccef5a58c1bf518ac24816fe8a6 upstream.

Emmanuel reports that when CMD_WANT_ASYNC_CALLBACK is used by mvm,
the callback will be called with the command queue lock held, and
mvm will try to stop all (other) TX queues, which acquires their
locks - this caused a false lockdep recursive locking report.

Suppress this report by marking the command queue lock with a new,
separate, lock class so lockdep can tell the difference between
the two types of queues.

Fixes: 156f92f2b471 ("iwlwifi: block the queues when we send ADD_STA for uAPSD")
Reported-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/pcie/tx.c |    8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

--- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/pcie/tx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/pcie/tx.c
@@ -522,6 +522,7 @@ error:
 static int iwl_pcie_txq_init(struct iwl_trans *trans, struct iwl_txq *txq,
                              int slots_num, u32 txq_id)
 {
+       struct iwl_trans_pcie *trans_pcie = IWL_TRANS_GET_PCIE_TRANS(trans);
        int ret;
 
        txq->need_update = false;
@@ -536,6 +537,13 @@ static int iwl_pcie_txq_init(struct iwl_
                return ret;
 
        spin_lock_init(&txq->lock);
+
+       if (txq_id == trans_pcie->cmd_queue) {
+               static struct lock_class_key iwl_pcie_cmd_queue_lock_class;
+
+               lockdep_set_class(&txq->lock, &iwl_pcie_cmd_queue_lock_class);
+       }
+
        __skb_queue_head_init(&txq->overflow_q);
 
        /*


Reply via email to