4.8-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>

commit c72ab446cac1d6c9551fd26c4cfef1b2fc5041fd upstream.

Markus reported that there's a weird behavior on perf top --hierarchy
regarding the column length.

Looking at the code, I found a dubious code which affects the symptoms.
When --hierarchy option is used, the last column length might be
inaccurate since it skips to update the length on leaf entries.

I cannot remember why it did and looks like a leftover from previous
version during the development.

Anyway, updating the column length often is not harmful.  So let's move
the code out.

Reported-and-Tested-by: Markus Trippelsdorf <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Fixes: 1a3906a7e6b9 ("perf hists: Resort hist entries with hierarchy")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
 tools/perf/util/hist.c |   12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/tools/perf/util/hist.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/hist.c
@@ -1596,18 +1596,18 @@ static void hists__hierarchy_output_reso
                if (prog)
                        ui_progress__update(prog, 1);
 
+               hists->nr_entries++;
+               if (!he->filtered) {
+                       hists->nr_non_filtered_entries++;
+                       hists__calc_col_len(hists, he);
+               }
+
                if (!he->leaf) {
                        hists__hierarchy_output_resort(hists, prog,
                                                       &he->hroot_in,
                                                       &he->hroot_out,
                                                       min_callchain_hits,
                                                       use_callchain);
-                       hists->nr_entries++;
-                       if (!he->filtered) {
-                               hists->nr_non_filtered_entries++;
-                               hists__calc_col_len(hists, he);
-                       }
-
                        continue;
                }
 


Reply via email to