On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 3:31 AM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 23/11/2016 02:14, David Matlack wrote:
>> +static bool fixed_bits_valid(u64 val, u64 fixed0, u64 fixed1)
>> +{
>> +     return ((val & fixed0) == fixed0) && ((~val & ~fixed1) == ~fixed1);
>> +}
>> +
>
> This is the same as vmx_control_verify (except with u64 arguments
> instead of u32).

Good point. I'll remove this duplication in v3.

Reply via email to