On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 16:33:07 -0800 Jacob Pan <jacob.jun....@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > + cpuidle_use_deepest_state(false); > > > > This actually depends on your [2/2], doesn't it? > > right, I shall put that after 2/2. I mean reverse the order of the two patches. Should I resend the series or you can reverse the order? Thanks, Jacob
