>Where is kiocbSetPgBusy() defined, It is defined in include/linux/aio.h (introduced in [PATCH 1/3]) > and where in the documentation is it explained? I will add a comment for kiocbSetPgBusy()in aio.h.
> For that matter, what is the reason for changing the return value at all? EIORETRY is not IO return value at all. It is processing stage. It conflicts with IO return value. That is why a flag in iocb is used. It should be noted that loop but not EIOCBRETRY was used for vector IO (mm/filemap.c) Leonid >-----Original Message----- >From: Alan Stern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 10:36 PM >To: Ananiev, Leonid I >Cc: Kernel development list >Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] aio: fix oops because of extra IO control block freeing. > >On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, Leonid Ananiev wrote: > >> From Leonid Ananiev >> >> This patch finishes moving from using errno EIOCBRETRY to using flag in >> IO control block for aio retrying. After this change the process will be >> kicked for direct aio as it was for sync aio. >> >> Signed-off-by: Leonid Ananiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> The patch is applied to 2.6.20 or 2.6.21-rc2 >> diff -uprN -X linux-2.6.20-aio21/Documentation/dontdiff >> linux-2.6.20-aio21/drivers/usb/gadget/inode.c >> linux-2.6.20-aio22/drivers/usb/gadget/inode.c >> --- linux-2.6.20-aio21/drivers/usb/gadget/inode.c 2007-03-04 >> 21:45:52.000000000 +0300 >> +++ linux-2.6.20-aio22/drivers/usb/gadget/inode.c 2007-03-05 >> 18:19:35.000000000 +0300 >> @@ -692,7 +692,10 @@ fail: >> kfree(priv); >> put_ep(epdata); >> } else >> - value = (iv ? -EIOCBRETRY : -EIOCBQUEUED); >> + if (iv) >> + kiocbSetPgBusy(iocb); >> + else >> + value = -EIOCBQUEUED; >> return value; >> } >> >> diff -uprN -X linux-2.6.20-aio21/Documentation/dontdiff >> linux-2.6.20-aio21/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c linux-2.6.20-aio22/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c >> --- linux-2.6.20-aio21/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c 2007-03-04 21:45:52.000000000 >> +0300 >> +++ linux-2.6.20-aio22/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c 2007-03-04 22:57:50.000000000 >> +0300 >> @@ -1639,7 +1639,7 @@ int ocfs2_meta_lock_full(struct inode *i >> >> status = ocfs2_cluster_lock(osb, lockres, level, dlm_flags, arg_flags); >> if (status < 0) { >> - if (status != -EAGAIN && status != -EIOCBRETRY) >> + if (status != -EAGAIN) >> mlog_errno(status); >> goto bail; >> } >> diff -uprN -X linux-2.6.20-aio21/Documentation/dontdiff >> linux-2.6.20-aio21/include/linux/aio.h >> linux-2.6.20-aio22/include/linux/aio.h >> --- linux-2.6.20-aio21/include/linux/aio.h 2007-03-04 21:46:45.000000000 >> +0300 >> +++ linux-2.6.20-aio22/include/linux/aio.h 2007-03-04 22:57:50.000000000 >> +0300 >> @@ -79,15 +79,6 @@ struct kioctx; >> * not ask the method again -- ki_retry must ensure forward progress. >> * aio_complete() must be called once and only once in the future, >> multiple >> * calls may result in undefined behaviour. >> - * >> - * If ki_retry returns -EIOCBRETRY it has made a promise that kick_iocb() >> - * will be called on the kiocb pointer in the future. This may happen >> - * through generic helpers that associate kiocb->ki_wait with a wait >> - * queue head that ki_retry uses via current->io_wait. It can also happen >> - * with custom tracking and manual calls to kick_iocb(), though that is >> - * discouraged. In either case, kick_iocb() must be called once and only >> - * once. ki_retry must ensure forward progress, the AIO core will wait >> - * indefinitely for kick_iocb() to be called. >> */ >> struct kiocb { >> struct list_head ki_run_list; >> diff -uprN -X linux-2.6.20-aio21/Documentation/dontdiff >> linux-2.6.20-aio21/include/linux/errno.h >> linux-2.6.20-aio22/include/linux/errno.h >> --- linux-2.6.20-aio21/include/linux/errno.h 2007-03-04 >> 21:45:51.000000000 +0300 >> +++ linux-2.6.20-aio22/include/linux/errno.h 2007-03-04 >> 22:57:50.000000000 +0300 >> @@ -22,7 +22,6 @@ >> #define EBADTYPE 527 /* Type not supported by server */ >> #define EJUKEBOX 528 /* Request initiated, but will not complete >> before timeout */ >> #define EIOCBQUEUED 529 /* iocb queued, will get completion event */ >> -#define EIOCBRETRY 530 /* iocb queued, will trigger a retry */ >> >> #endif > >Where is kiocbSetPgBusy() defined, and where in the documentation is it >explained? For that matter, what is the reason for changing the return >value at all? > >And if you are going to change, why not make the return value something >more logical? For instance, return 0 to indicate the iocb is complete and >-EINPROGRESS to indicate another kick will occur. > >Alan Stern - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/