On 1 December 2016 at 09:39, Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au> wrote:
> Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org> writes:
>> On 25 November 2016 at 11:29, Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au> wrote:
>>> Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org> writes:
>>>
>>> [    7.607687] kvm: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout
>>> [    7.846799] virtio: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout
>>> [   22.012615] crc32c_vpmsum: disagrees about version of symbol 
>>> module_layout
>>> [   22.012959] libcrc32c: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout
>>>
>>
>> Sigh. I suppose your modversions fixes are queued for v4.10? It's
>> probably best to revisit this after the v4.10 merge window closes
>> then, just to make sure I'm not aiming for a moving target.
>
> Actually they were merged into 4.9-rc7 ish.
>
> But I'm still seeing the same as above with this series rebased on top
> of that, and I'm a bit short on time to debug it ATM.
>
> So during the 4.10 cycle is probably the best we can hope for, sorry.
>

Not a problem. The only question is whether 1/3 of this series fixes
an actual bug or not, given that the CONFIG_RELOCATABLE workaround has
been made ppc64 only.

But for the remaining patches, I'm happy to respin after the v4.10
merge window closes, and get something queued for v4.11

-- 
Ard.

Reply via email to