On Thu, 1 Dec 2016, Charles Keepax wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 06:10:49PM +0100, Florian Vaussard wrote:
> > Using regmap_update_bits(..., mask, 1) with 'mask' following (1 << k)
> > and k greater than 0 is wrong. Indeed, _regmap_update_bits will perform
> > (mask & 1), which results in 0 if LSB of mask is 0. Thus the call
> > regmap_update_bits(..., mask, 1) is in reality equivalent to
> > regmap_update_bits(..., mask, 0).
> > In such a case, the correct use is regmap_update_bits(..., mask, mask).
> > This driver is performing such a mistake with the CS42L56_AIN*_REF_MASK
> > masks, which equal 0x10, 0x20, 0x40 and 0x80. Fix the driver to make it
> > consistent with the API. Please note that this change is untested,
> > as I do not have this piece of hardware. Testers are welcome!
> > Signed-off-by: Florian Vaussard <florian.vauss...@heig-vd.ch>
> > ---
> Looks good to me:
> Reviewed-by: Charles Keepax <ckee...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Acked-by: Brian Austin <brian.aus...@cirrus.com>