* Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 12:34:55PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > Aside from being excessively slow, CPUID is problematic: Linux runs
> > on a handful of CPUs that don't have CPUID.  MOV to CR2 is always
> > available, so use it instead.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <l...@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 31 ++++++++-----------------------
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> 
> Looks nice.
> 
> I'm wondering if we should leave this one in tip for an additional cycle
> to have it tested on more hw. I know, it is architectural and so on but
> who knows what every implementation actually does...

I think -tip and "upstream of the day" mostly gets tested on relatively recent 
x86 
hardware - proven by the fact that these regressions are many months old.

The reason v4.9 got extra testing is the announced Long Term Support (LTS) 
aspect: 
more, older, weirder hardware is being tested because it's going to be a very 
popular base kernel.

So the best option would be to get these fixes into -tip, make sure it's sane 
all 
around and works on hardware that gets tested on bleeding edge kernels, then 
push 
it upstream sooner rather than later and also have Cc:stable tags on the 
obvious 
fixes, and handle any eventual fallout as it happens.

That's the best we can do I think.

Thanks,

        Ingo

Reply via email to