On 12/01/2016 05:13 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:29:00PM +0530, Nayna wrote:
On 11/26/2016 09:17 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 07:45:39AM -0500, Nayna Jain wrote:
Unlike the device driver support for TPM 1.2, the TPM 2.0 does
not support the securityfs pseudo files for displaying the
firmware event log.
This patch enables support for providing the TPM 2.0 event log in
binary form. TPM 2.0 event log supports a crypto agile format that
records multiple digests, which is different from TPM 1.2. This
patch enables the tpm_bios_log_setup for TPM 2.0 and adds the
event log parser which understand the TPM 2.0 crypto agile format.
Signed-off-by: Nayna Jain <na...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
I would not rush with new patch set versions as long as the testing is
almost completely lacking. I didn't even have time to read the previous
version properly before this came out.
Sure Jarkko. My apologies for multiple versions. I will wait for testing,
before posting my next version.
You could send now a new version because probably anyone who wants
to review your patches has had a chance to look at it. My point was
that you wait for at least few days.
Sure Jarkko. Thanks !!
Also Jarkko/Jason, please let me know your views on #defines in
tpm_eventlog.h for TPM 2.0 event log support. I have responded to the
related and other feedbacks in my previous mail sent on 30th Nov.
Thanks & Regards,
- Nayna
Maybe Jason could help testing your patches. I don't know when I have
time to setup environment. He had OF environment available.
/Jarkko
