On Tuesday 06 March 2007 18:02, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 17:25:36 +1100 Con Kolivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Con Kolivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > ---
> >  kernel/sched.c |    2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > Index: linux-2.6.21-rc2-mm1-base/kernel/sched.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.21-rc2-mm1-base.orig/kernel/sched.c   2007-03-06
> > 17:19:17.000000000 +1100 +++
> > linux-2.6.21-rc2-mm1-base/kernel/sched.c    2007-03-06 17:20:40.000000000
> > +1100 @@ -3444,7 +3444,7 @@ void scheduler_tick(void)
> >
> >     update_cpu_clock(p, rq, now);
> >
> > -   if (idle_at_tick)
> > +   if (!idle_at_tick)
> >             task_running_tick(rq, p);
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> >     update_load(rq);
>
> Looks right, thanks.  The original patch had
>
> -     if (p == rq->idle)
> +     if (idle_at_tick)
>               /* Task on the idle queue */
>               wake_priority_sleeper(rq);
>       else
>               task_running_tick(rq, p);
>
> but it got damaged by smt-nice removal.

I gathered something like that happened. If it wasn't clear this change caused 
massive scheduler damage with no cpu accounting whatsoever occurring. I 
recommend putting it in your hotfixes/ dir if you're not planning an -mm2 
soon.

-- 
-ck
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to