On Tue, 06 Dec, at 11:15:59AM, Sai Praneeth Prakhya wrote:
> From: Sai Praneeth <sai.praneeth.prak...@intel.com>
> 
> UEFI v2.6 introduces EFI_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES_TABLE which describes memory 
> protections that may be applied to EFI Runtime code and data regions by 
> kernel. This helps kernel to map efi runtime regions more strictly and 
> hence allowing only appropriate accesses to these regions. Please refer 
> to "EFI_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES_TABLE" in section 4.6 of UEFI specification 
> v2.6 for more information on this table.
> 
> This patch set relies on commit a604af075a32 ("efi: Add support for the 
> EFI_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES_TABLE config table"), commit 10f0d2f57705 ("efi: 
> Implement generic support for the Memory Attributes table") and hence 
> implements support for only x86.
> 
> Since the above commits have already implemented early discovery and 
> validation of table, the following patches implement a call back 
> function for x86 which is called only when EFI_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES_TABLE 
> is detected.
> 
> Patch #1 makes the efi_memory_attributes table detection code generic 
> across all architectures
> 
> Patch #2 adds EFI_MEM_ATTR bit to keep track of this feature
> 
> Patch #3 Implements call back function that does stricter mappings based 
> on this table
> 
> Patch #4 Skip parsing of EFI_PROPERTIES_TABLE if EFI_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES_TABLE 
> is detected
> 
> Sai Praneeth (4):
>   efi: Make EFI_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES_TABLE initialization common across all
>     architectures
>   efi: Introduce EFI_MEM_ATTR bit and set it from memory attributes
>     table
>   x86/efi: Add support for EFI_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES_TABLE
>   efi: Skip parsing of EFI_PROPERTIES_TABLE if
>     EFI_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES_TABLE is detected
> 
>  arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c  | 64 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  drivers/firmware/efi/arm-init.c |  1 -
>  drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c      | 13 +++++++++
>  drivers/firmware/efi/memattr.c  |  6 +++-
>  include/linux/efi.h             |  1 +
>  5 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

Thanks Sai, I've queued this up for v4.11.

Reply via email to