On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Vaneet Narang <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > >> Do you actually hit an issue with image size? In what context? >> Do you use inline/outline instrumentation? Does switching to the other >> option help? > > Memory access with KASAN enabled Image has overhead in terms of cpu execution. > Sometimes we are not able to reproduce race condition issues with these > overhead in > place. So user should have control atleast over read instrumentation.
Don't you want to disable KASAN entirely in such case? >> Does it make sense to ever disable writes? I assume that you are > > Write instrumentation control is majorly kept to be inline with ASAN for user > space > applications. > Also write is sometimes useful when uImage is already sanitized and some > corruption > is done by kernel modules by doing some direct memory access then both read / > write sanity of uImage > can be avoided. But then you don't need KASAN at all. >> disabling reads, right? >> Disabling both certainly does not make sense.
