On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 02:28:11PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > @@ -259,6 +262,32 @@ static const struct max77686_rtc_driver_data
> > max77802_drv_data = {
> > .rtc_irq_chip = &max77802_rtc_irq_chip,
> > };
> >
> > +static inline int _regmap_bulk_write(struct max77686_rtc_info *info,
>
> rtc_regmap_bulk_write?
I think max77686_regmap_bulk_write would be nice. This might still pop
somewhere in the backtrace so the prefix is useful.
>
> > + unsigned int reg, void *val, int len)
> > +{
>
> Please keep arguments (except "info" one) in sync with regmap_bulk_write():
>
> int regmap_bulk_write(struct regmap *map, unsigned int reg, const void *val,
> size_t val_count)
>
> > + int ret = 0;
> > +
> > + if (!info->drv_data->avoid_rtc_bulk_write) {
> > + /* RTC registers support sequential writing */
> > + ret = regmap_bulk_write(info->rtc_regmap, reg, val, len);
> > + } else {
> > + /* Power registers support register-data pair writing */
>
> Hmn, maybe this can be handled be regmap_bulk_write() with proper
> regmap setting (map->bus == NULL?), can anyone with more regmap
> expertise comment on this?
Good catch. This does not look like a property of this device driver but
of the bus it is attached to.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
