Hi all, I am having this problem. I have a process with 2 threads created. One of the thread will keep calling IOCTL to get information from the kernel and will be blocked if there is no new information. If there is information retured, the thread will be checked to see if any error happens and trigger an action. Since we have no way to know if the error is gone (Hardware provides no signal), so what we do is when trigger an action for the error, we will set an timer using alarm() and register a SIGALRM handler in the thread by using sigaction. After setting the alarm, the thread will loop back and call IOCTL, which could cause it to be put to sleep. The problem is the SIGALRM handler does not receive the SIGALRM while the thread is being blocked by IOCTL. And if we generated some event so that the IOCTL is returned with new information, the SIGALRM handler is invoked right away. However, as I read the manual, which says a thread/process should be waken up even when it sleeps if there is a signal delivered to it. Am I right? One thing I don't know it mattters or not is that I am not using sigwait to block the process and wait for signal because the thread need to go back to the IOCTL call and be slept on that. So I used sigaction to register the signal handler in hope that this handler wil be invoked by the kernel when there is an SIGALRM delivered to the thread. Could anyone tell me if I did something wrong and what is the correct way to achieve this task? I tried to avoid creating another thread which will call sigwait and block until the IOCTL thread send it explicitly a signal because I want to use timer.
Thank you in advance, LNgo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
