On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 10:14:42AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> A typo (or mis-merge?) resulted in leaf 6 only being probed if
> cpuid_level >= 7.
> 
> Fixes: 2ccd71f1b278 ("x86/cpufeature: Move some of the scattered feature bits 
> to x86_capability")
> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>
> ---
> 
> I don't know what CPUs, if any, are affected, and the bug is minor anyway,
> so the major advantage of applying this is to remove a head-scratcher when
> reading the code, I think.
> 
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 7 ++++---
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> index cc9e980c68ec..d61722821b7b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> @@ -667,13 +667,14 @@ void get_cpu_cap(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
>               c->x86_capability[CPUID_1_EDX] = edx;
>       }
>  
> +     /* Thermal and Power Management Leaf: level 0x00000006 (eax) */
> +     if (c->cpuid_level >= 0x00000006)
> +             c->x86_capability[CPUID_6_EAX] = cpuid_eax(0x00000006);
> +
>       /* Additional Intel-defined flags: level 0x00000007 */
>       if (c->cpuid_level >= 0x00000007) {
>               cpuid_count(0x00000007, 0, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
> -
>               c->x86_capability[CPUID_7_0_EBX] = ebx;
> -
> -             c->x86_capability[CPUID_6_EAX] = cpuid_eax(0x00000006);
>               c->x86_capability[CPUID_7_ECX] = ecx;
>       }
>  
> -- 

Yeah,

Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>

However, as we talked already, this whole code needs a serious cleanup
so that it reads the max leaf and then read *all* and cache those we
need and do it only once.

Future work anyway.

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

Reply via email to