For some odd reason, it forces a byte-by-byte copy of each field. A
plain old swap() on most of these fields would be more efficient. We
do need to retain one memswap however as that field is an array.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <[email protected]>
---
 fs/ext4/ioctl.c | 18 ++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/ioctl.c b/fs/ext4/ioctl.c
index 49fd1371bfa2..fb844da4836f 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ioctl.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/ioctl.c
@@ -60,18 +60,16 @@ static void swap_inode_data(struct inode *inode1, struct 
inode *inode2)
        ei1 = EXT4_I(inode1);
        ei2 = EXT4_I(inode2);
 
-       memswap(&inode1->i_flags, &inode2->i_flags, sizeof(inode1->i_flags));
-       memswap(&inode1->i_version, &inode2->i_version,
-                 sizeof(inode1->i_version));
-       memswap(&inode1->i_blocks, &inode2->i_blocks,
-                 sizeof(inode1->i_blocks));
-       memswap(&inode1->i_bytes, &inode2->i_bytes, sizeof(inode1->i_bytes));
-       memswap(&inode1->i_atime, &inode2->i_atime, sizeof(inode1->i_atime));
-       memswap(&inode1->i_mtime, &inode2->i_mtime, sizeof(inode1->i_mtime));
+       swap(inode1->i_flags, inode2->i_flags);
+       swap(inode1->i_version, inode2->i_version);
+       swap(inode1->i_blocks, inode2->i_blocks);
+       swap(inode1->i_bytes, inode2->i_bytes);
+       swap(inode1->i_atime, inode2->i_atime);
+       swap(inode1->i_mtime, inode2->i_mtime);
 
        memswap(ei1->i_data, ei2->i_data, sizeof(ei1->i_data));
-       memswap(&ei1->i_flags, &ei2->i_flags, sizeof(ei1->i_flags));
-       memswap(&ei1->i_disksize, &ei2->i_disksize, sizeof(ei1->i_disksize));
+       swap(ei1->i_flags, ei2->i_flags);
+       swap(ei1->i_disksize, ei2->i_disksize);
        ext4_es_remove_extent(inode1, 0, EXT_MAX_BLOCKS);
        ext4_es_remove_extent(inode2, 0, EXT_MAX_BLOCKS);
 
-- 
2.7.4

Reply via email to