Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Tue, 6 Mar 2007, Andres Salomon wrote: > >> It would've been nice to see the ZONE_DMA removal patches just #define >> ZONE_DMA regardless, and include less #ifdefs scattered about; but at >> this point, I'd just as soon prefer to see a proper way to allocate >> things based on address constraints (as discussed in >> http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/archives/linux-ia64/0609/19036.html). > > Would you be willing to work on that? I can sent you a bunch of unfinished > patches if you have the time.
Sure, I'd be willing to work on it. Whether or not I have the time is questionable, but it wouldn't hurt to send them.. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
