On (12/21/16 11:45), Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 6:36 AM, Sergey Senozhatsky
> <sergey.senozhat...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > A preparation patch for printk_safe work. No functional change.
> > - rename nmi.c to print_safe.c
> > - rename exported functions to have a `printk_safe' prefix.
>
> I dislike this patch.
>
> It's _mostly_ ok, but the nmi naming is nasty.
ok, will change. Petr complained about the nmi naming as well.
-ss
> Either "printk_nmi()" or "printk_safe" is fine, but doing *both* is
> stupid and wrong. And you do both in a couple of places.
>
> So please keep the printk_nmi_enter/exit() naming. Because
> "printk_safe_nmi_enter/exit()" is just stupid. It's about nmi entry.
> The "safe" part is simply an implementation detail.
>
> Linus
>
