On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 05:07:43PM +0800, Zhou Wang wrote:
> Multiple PCIe host bridges may exists in one PCIe segment. So bus range for 
> each
> host bridge should be in the coverage of bus range of related PCIe segment.
> 
> This patch will support this kind of scenario:
> 
> MCFG:
>       bus range: 0x00~0xff.
>       segment: 0.
> DSDT:
>       host bridge 1:
>               bus range: 0x00~0x1f.
>               segment: 0.
>       host bridge 2:
>               bus range: 0x20~0x4f.
>               segment: 0.

"The configuration data provided by an MCFG region (ie PCI segment and
bus range) may span multiple host bridges.

Current code in pci_mcfg_lookup() carries out an exact match of host
bridge bus range start value against the MCFG region(s) bus range start
value which would cause configurations like the following:

MCFG region:
        bus range: 0x00~0xff.
        segment: 0.

PCI host bridges configuration (segment numbers and bus ranges):
        host bridge 1:
                bus range: 0x00~0x1f.
                segment: 0.
        host bridge 2:
                bus range: 0x20~0x4f.
                segment: 0.

to fail, in that the bus range start value for host bridge 2 does
not match the bus range start value of the respective MCFG region.

Relax the bus range check in pci_mcfg_lookup() to cater for
PCI configurations with multiple host bridges sharing the same
MCFG region."

Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <[email protected]>

> Signed-off-by: Zhou Wang <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c | 5 ++---
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c
> index b5b376e..46a3e32 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c
> @@ -40,11 +40,10 @@ phys_addr_t pci_mcfg_lookup(u16 seg, struct resource 
> *bus_res)
>       struct mcfg_entry *e;
>  
>       /*
> -      * We expect exact match, unless MCFG entry end bus covers more than
> -      * specified by caller.
> +      * We expect the range in bus_res in the coverage of MCFG bus range.
>        */
>       list_for_each_entry(e, &pci_mcfg_list, list) {
> -             if (e->segment == seg && e->bus_start == bus_res->start &&
> +             if (e->segment == seg && e->bus_start <= bus_res->start &&
>                   e->bus_end >= bus_res->end)
>                       return e->addr;
>       }
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 

Reply via email to