Am 16.12.2016 um 16:10 schrieb Radim Krčmář:
irqchip_in_kernel() tried to save a bit by reusing pic_irqchip(), but it
just complicated the code.
Add a separate state for the irqchip mode.
Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <[email protected]>
---
v2: change two bools into one enum and rename everything [Paolo]
---
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 8 +++++++-
arch/x86/kvm/irq.h | 15 ++++++++-------
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 5 +++--
3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 7892530cbacf..d3acd295446d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -715,6 +715,12 @@ struct kvm_hv {
HV_REFERENCE_TSC_PAGE tsc_ref;
};
+enum kvm_irqchip_mode {
+ KVM_IRQCHIP_NONE,
+ KVM_IRQCHIP_KERNEL, /* created with KVM_CREATE_IRQCHIP */
+ KVM_IRQCHIP_SPLIT, /* created with KVM_CAP_SPLIT_IRQCHIP */
Was wondering if FULL/SPLIT would be a better naming. However I also
find irqchip_kernel() vs irqchip_in_kernel() slightly confusing.
Anyhow, with the suggestion of Paolo included,
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <[email protected]>
+};
--
David
