* Casey Schaufler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > --- "Serge E. Hallyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > It's unfortunate, agreed, but > > > > use of LSM as an integrity framework was also a > > no-go. > > You're going to have to justify this assertion. > I know of at least one work-in-progress for which > LSM works just fine. Not to mention the Integrity > claims of SELinux.
Serge is referring to the objections to EVM/IMA as LSM because it was not doing access control, rather integrity measurements. It's all in somewhere the archives. thanks, -chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
