On Thursday 08 March 2007 19:49, Tom Rini wrote: > On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 07:37:56PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > > On Thursday 08 March 2007 18:44, Dave Jiang wrote: > > > > > In spite of kgdb, shouldn't it have that \n anyways in case some other > > > code > > > gets added in the future after the macro? Or are you saying that there > > > should > > > never be any code ever after that macro? > > > > Sure if there is mainline code added after that macro we add the \n. > > But only if it makes sense to add code there, which it didn't in kgdb. > > Was that because with recent enough tools and config options there was > enough annotations so GDB could finally figure out where things had > stopped?
The x86 kernels are fully dwarf2 annotiated yes. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/