From: David Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:01:13 +0000
> Most system calls seem to get added to i386 first. This patch > automatically generates a warning for any new system call which is > implemented on i386 but not the architecture currently being compiled. > On PowerPC at the moment, for example, it results in these warnings: > init/missing_syscalls.h:935:3: warning: #warning syscall sync_file_range not > implemented > init/missing_syscalls.h:947:3: warning: #warning syscall getcpu not > implemented > init/missing_syscalls.h:950:3: warning: #warning syscall epoll_pwait not > implemented > > Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> David, thanks for this __incredibly__ __useful__ patch. I kicked it around on sparc64 and found some more ignores to add, see below. The vast majority of them vector to sys_ni_syscall in the i386 syscall table. sys_ugetrlimit is only necessary if the platform started out using the non-SuS compliant sys_old_getrlimit() The rest, like ioperm, iopl, modify_ldt, et al. are i386 specific. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- a/init/missing_syscalls.c.ORIG 2007-03-08 16:11:00.000000000 -0800 +++ b/init/missing_syscalls.c 2007-03-08 16:02:30.000000000 -0800 @@ -18,6 +18,22 @@ #endif /* i386-specific or historical system calls */ +#define __IGNORE_break +#define __IGNORE_stty +#define __IGNORE_gtty +#define __IGNORE_ftime +#define __IGNORE_prof +#define __IGNORE_lock +#define __IGNORE_mpx +#define __IGNORE_ulimit +#define __IGNORE_profil +#define __IGNORE_ioperm +#define __IGNORE_iopl +#define __IGNORE_idle +#define __IGNORE_modify_ldt +#define __IGNORE_getpmsg +#define __IGNORE_putpmsg +#define __IGNORE_ugetrlimit #define __IGNORE_mmap2 #define __IGNORE_vm86 #define __IGNORE_vm86old - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
