Hi Chris, On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 11:04:57AM +1100, Chris Lapa wrote: > From: Chris Lapa <[email protected]> > > The BQ275XX definition exists only to satisfy backwards compatibility. > > tested: yes > > Signed-off-by: Chris Lapa <[email protected]> > > [...] > > static bool bq27xxx_battery_overtemp(struct bq27xxx_device_info *di, u16 > flags) > { > - if (di->chip == BQ27500 || di->chip == BQ27541 || di->chip == BQ27545) > + if (di->chip == BQ275XX || di->chip == BQ27541 || di->chip == BQ27545) > return flags & (BQ27XXX_FLAG_OTC | BQ27XXX_FLAG_OTD); > if (di->chip == BQ27530 || di->chip == BQ27421) > return flags & BQ27XXX_FLAG_OT;
This is really getting out of hands in this patchset. Please
add a patch at the beginning of the patchset, which converts
this construct into the following:
switch (di->chip) {
case A:
case B:
case C:
case D:
return flags & (BQ27XXX_FLAG_OTC | BQ27XXX_FLAG_OTD);
case E:
case F:
return flags & BQ27XXX_FLAG_OT;
default:
return false;
}
-- Sebastian
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

