Only comments are to do with the comments...

On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 03:01:14PM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote:
> 
> adjust_lowmem_bounds is responsible for setting up the boundary for
> lowmem/hihgmme. This needs to be setup before memblock reservations can

highmem

> occur. At the time memblock reservations can occur, memory can also be
> removed from the system. The lowmem/highmem boundary and end of memory
> may be affected by this but it is currently not recalculated. On some
> systems this may be harmless, on o thers this may result in incorrect

others

> ranges being passed to the main memory allocator. Correct this by
> recalculating the lowmem/highmem boundary after all reservations have
> been made.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <[email protected]>
> ---
> v2: Rebased for changes in sanity_check_meminfo cleanup
> ---
>  arch/arm/kernel/setup.c | 8 ++++++++
>  arch/arm/mm/mmu.c       | 9 ++++++---
>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
> index 8a8051c..4625115 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -1093,8 +1093,16 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
>       setup_dma_zone(mdesc);
>       xen_early_init();
>       efi_init();
> +     /*
> +      * Make sure the calcualtion for lowmem/highmem is set appropriately

calculation

> +      * before reserving/allocating any mmeory
> +      */
>       adjust_lowmem_bounds();
>       arm_memblock_init(mdesc);
> +     /*
> +      * Memory may have been removed so recalculate the bounds.
> +      */

Single line comments should be... /* blah */

> +     adjust_lowmem_bounds();
>  
>       early_ioremap_reset();
>  
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> index ce5123b..7ca6910 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> @@ -1157,6 +1157,7 @@ void __init adjust_lowmem_bounds(void)
>       phys_addr_t memblock_limit = 0;
>       u64 vmalloc_limit;
>       struct memblock_region *reg;
> +     phys_addr_t lowmem_limit = 0;
>  
>       /*
>        * Let's use our own (unoptimized) equivalent of __pa() that is
> @@ -1173,14 +1174,14 @@ void __init adjust_lowmem_bounds(void)
>  
>  
>               if (reg->base < vmalloc_limit) {
> -                     if (block_end > arm_lowmem_limit)
> +                     if (block_end > lowmem_limit)
>                               /*
>                                * Compare as u64 to ensure vmalloc_limit does
>                                * not get truncated. block_end should always
>                                * fit in phys_addr_t so there should be no
>                                * issue with assignment.
>                                */
> -                             arm_lowmem_limit = min_t(u64,
> +                             lowmem_limit = min_t(u64,
>                                                        vmalloc_limit,
>                                                        block_end);
>  
> @@ -1201,12 +1202,14 @@ void __init adjust_lowmem_bounds(void)
>                               if (!IS_ALIGNED(block_start, PMD_SIZE))
>                                       memblock_limit = block_start;
>                               else if (!IS_ALIGNED(block_end, PMD_SIZE))
> -                                     memblock_limit = arm_lowmem_limit;
> +                                     memblock_limit = lowmem_limit;
>                       }
>  
>               }
>       }
>  
> +     arm_lowmem_limit = lowmem_limit;
> +
>       high_memory = __va(arm_lowmem_limit - 1) + 1;
>  
>       /*
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.

Reply via email to