On Tue, 10 Jan 2017, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
Well, speaking of naming, rcuwait_trywake() doesn't look good to me, rcuwait_wake_up() looks better, "try" is misleading imo. But this is cosmetic/subjective too.
I actually added the 'try' on second thought -- in that for the particular pcpu-rwsem user, obviously most of the time the wakeup will not actually occur. But yeah, I'd have no problem just naming it rcuwait_wake_up().
Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
Thanks!
