On 01/11/2017 11:11 AM, David Daney wrote:
From: David Daney <[email protected]>
The pci-thunder-pem driver was initially developed for cn88xx SoCs.
The cn81xx and cn83xx members of the same family of SoCs has a
slightly different configuration of interrupt resources in the PEM
hardware, which prevents the INTA legacy interrupt source from
functioning with the current driver.
There are two fixes required:
1) Don't fixup the PME interrupt on the newer SoCs as it already has
the proper value.
2) Report MSI-X Capability Table Size of 2 for the newer SoCs, so the
core MSI-X code doesn't inadvertently clobber the INTA machinery that
happens to reside immediately following the table.
Signed-off-by: David Daney <[email protected]>
---
drivers/pci/host/pci-thunder-pem.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-thunder-pem.c
b/drivers/pci/host/pci-thunder-pem.c
index af722eb..eea466f 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-thunder-pem.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-thunder-pem.c
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ struct thunder_pem_pci {
static int thunder_pem_bridge_read(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn,
int where, int size, u32 *val)
{
- u64 read_val;
+ u64 read_val, tmp_val;
struct pci_config_window *cfg = bus->sysdata;
struct thunder_pem_pci *pem_pci = (struct thunder_pem_pci *)cfg->priv;
@@ -65,13 +65,28 @@ static int thunder_pem_bridge_read(struct pci_bus *bus,
unsigned int devfn,
read_val |= 0x00007000; /* Skip MSI CAP */
break;
case 0x70: /* Express Cap */
- /* PME interrupt on vector 2*/
- read_val |= (2u << 25);
+ /*
+ * Change PME interrupt to vector 2 on T88 where it
+ * reads as 0, else leave it alone.
+ */
+ if (!(read_val & (0x1f << 25)))
+ read_val |= (2u << 25);
break;
case 0xb0: /* MSI-X Cap */
- /* TableSize=4, Next Cap is EA */
+ /* TableSize=2 or 4, Next Cap is EA */
read_val &= 0xc00000ff;
- read_val |= 0x0003bc00;
+ /*
+ * If Express Cap(0x70) raw PME vector reads as 2 we are on
Crap! The comment is incorrect s/2/0/, I guess I will send a corrected
patch. The code is correct though.
+ * T88 and TableSize is reported as 4, else TableSize
+ * is 2.
+ */
+ writeq(0x70, pem_pci->pem_reg_base + PEM_CFG_RD);
+ tmp_val = readq(pem_pci->pem_reg_base + PEM_CFG_RD);
+ tmp_val >>= 32;
+ if (!(tmp_val & (0x1f << 25)))
+ read_val |= 0x0003bc00;
+ else
+ read_val |= 0x0001bc00;
break;
case 0xb4:
/* Table offset=0, BIR=0 */
