Hi James,

On 10/01/17 02:28, Eddie Huang wrote:
Hi Matthias,

On Mon, 2017-01-09 at 19:45 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote:

On 09/01/17 12:29, Hans Verkuil wrote:
Hi Rick,

On 01/06/2017 03:34 AM, Rick Chang wrote:
Hi Hans,

The dependence on [1] has been merged in 4.10, but [2] has not.Do you have
any idea about this patch series? Should we wait for [2] or we could merge
the source code and dt-binding first?

Looking at [2] I noticed that the last comment was July 4th. What is the reason
it hasn't been merged yet?

If I know [2] will be merged for 4.11, then I am fine with merging this media
patch series. The dependency of this patch on [2] is something Mauro can handle.

If [2] is not merged for 4.11, then I think it is better to wait until it is
merged.


I can't take [2] because there is no scpsys in the dts present. It seems
that it got never posted.

Rick can you please follow-up with James and provide a patch which adds
a scpsys node to the mt2701.dtsi?


James sent three MT2701 dts patches [1] two weeks ago, these three
patches include scpsys node. Please take a reference. And We will send
new MT2701 ionmmu/smi dtsi node patch base on [1] later, thus you can
accept and merge to 4.11.


Thanks for the clarification. I pulled all this patches into v4.10-next/dts32

Hans will you take v9 of this patch set?
Then I'll take the dts patch.

Regards,
Matthias

[1]
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9489991/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9489985/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9489989/

Thanks,
Eddie


Reply via email to