On Fri, 2017-01-13 at 09:28 -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Andy Shevchenko > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, 2017-01-12 at 10:01 -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 8:11 AM, Andy Shevchenko > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2017-01-06 at 10:26 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > Yes, otherwise the bus can be built as a module and this driver > > > can > > > still be enabled breaking the build. I could drop supporting > > > building > > > the bus as a module because as long as this is the only controller > > > driver, it all has to be built-in. > > > > Would > > > > if SERIAL_DEV_BUS=y > > > > work for you? > > Yes, until we add a driver that doesn't have to be built-in. What > about "depends on SERIAL_DEV_BUS != m"? That would be a bit more clear > what the reason is. Ah, good point. Yes, it would also work. My concern was here is not add confusing 'depend on MENU_OPTION'. -- Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]> Intel Finland Oy
