From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com>

Userspace applications should be allowed to expect the membarrier system
call with MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED command to issue memory barriers on
nohz_full CPUs, but synchronize_sched() does not take those into
account.

Given that we do not want unrelated processes to be able to affect
real-time sensitive nohz_full CPUs, simply return ENOSYS when membarrier
is invoked on a kernel with enabled nohz_full CPUs.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com>
CC: Josh Triplett <j...@joshtriplett.org>
CC: Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org>
CC: <sta...@vger.kernel.org>    [3.10+]
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweis...@gmail.com>
Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetc...@mellanox.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <r...@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan...@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/membarrier.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/membarrier.c b/kernel/membarrier.c
index 536c727a56e9..9f9284f37f8d 100644
--- a/kernel/membarrier.c
+++ b/kernel/membarrier.c
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
 
 #include <linux/syscalls.h>
 #include <linux/membarrier.h>
+#include <linux/tick.h>
 
 /*
  * Bitmask made from a "or" of all commands within enum membarrier_cmd,
@@ -51,6 +52,9 @@
  */
 SYSCALL_DEFINE2(membarrier, int, cmd, int, flags)
 {
+       /* MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED is not compatible with nohz_full. */
+       if (tick_nohz_full_enabled())
+               return -ENOSYS;
        if (unlikely(flags))
                return -EINVAL;
        switch (cmd) {
-- 
2.5.2

Reply via email to