On Sun, 11 Mar 2007, Nicholas Miell wrote: > You should probably make it behave like the other things that use > itimerspec, just to avoid confusion -- i.e. timers are relative by > default, there's a flag that makes them absolute, they expire when > it_value specifies, and repeat every it_interval nanoseconds if > it_interval is non-zero. > > i.e. > > int timerfd(int ufd, int clockid, int flags, const struct timespec > *utmr); > > with TFD_TIMER_ABS in flags making the timer absolute instead of > relative (and no TFD_TIMER_REL or TFD_TIMER_SEQ at all).
Sounds sane to me. Will do... - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
