ulseep_range() uses hrtimers and provides no advantage over msleep()
for larger delays. For this large delay msleep() is preferable.

Fixes: commit 6be88670fc59 ("NFC: nxp-nci_i2c: Add I2C support to NXP NCI 
driver")
Link: http://lkml.org/lkml/2017/1/11/377
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <[email protected]>
---
Problem was found by cocinelle script.

nxp_nci_i2c_write takes the negative return code as indicator that the
NFC device was probably in stand-by mode, the first transaction attempt
woke it up and that after 110ms latest it would be ready to receive.
Overrunning this time by a few milliseconds will not hurt though so
msleep() should be fine here.

Patch was compile tested with: x86_64_defconfig + CONFIG_NFC=m,
CONFIG_NFC_NCI=m, CONFIG_NFC_NXP_NCI=m, CONFIG_NFC_NXP_NCI_I2C=m

Patch is against 4.10-rc4 (localversion-next is next-20170120)

 drivers/nfc/nxp-nci/i2c.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nfc/nxp-nci/i2c.c b/drivers/nfc/nxp-nci/i2c.c
index 36099e5..ceb815c 100644
--- a/drivers/nfc/nxp-nci/i2c.c
+++ b/drivers/nfc/nxp-nci/i2c.c
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ static int nxp_nci_i2c_write(void *phy_id, struct sk_buff 
*skb)
        r = i2c_master_send(client, skb->data, skb->len);
        if (r < 0) {
                /* Retry, chip was in standby */
-               usleep_range(110000, 120000);
+               msleep(110);
                r = i2c_master_send(client, skb->data, skb->len);
        }
 
-- 
2.1.4

Reply via email to