Hi Stephen,
On 1/20/2017 11:12 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 01/09/2017 11:00 PM, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
From: Subhash Jadavani <subha...@codeaurora.org>
Program CORE_CSR_CDC_DELAY_CFG for hardware recommended 1.25ns delay.
We may see data CRC errors if it's programmed for any other delay
value.
Signed-off-by: Subhash Jadavani <subha...@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <rite...@codeaurora.org>
---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
index a028568..84d29dd 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
@@ -679,7 +679,7 @@ static int sdhci_msm_cdclp533_calibration(struct sdhci_host
*host)
writel_relaxed(0x4, host->ioaddr + CORE_CSR_CDC_CAL_TIMER_CFG1);
writel_relaxed(0xCB732020, host->ioaddr + CORE_CSR_CDC_REFCOUNT_CFG);
writel_relaxed(0xB19, host->ioaddr + CORE_CSR_CDC_COARSE_CAL_CFG);
- writel_relaxed(0x3AC, host->ioaddr + CORE_CSR_CDC_DELAY_CFG);
+ writel_relaxed(0x4E2, host->ioaddr + CORE_CSR_CDC_DELAY_CFG);
writel_relaxed(0x0, host->ioaddr + CORE_CDC_OFFSET_CFG);
writel_relaxed(0x16334, host->ioaddr + CORE_CDC_SLAVE_DDA_CFG);
There's a comment block above this set of writes that repeats what's
happening in the code.
/*
* Perform CDC Register Initialization Sequence
*
* CORE_CSR_CDC_CTLR_CFG0 0x11800EC
* CORE_CSR_CDC_CTLR_CFG1 0x3011111
* CORE_CSR_CDC_CAL_TIMER_CFG0 0x1201000
* CORE_CSR_CDC_CAL_TIMER_CFG1 0x4
* CORE_CSR_CDC_REFCOUNT_CFG 0xCB732020
* CORE_CSR_CDC_COARSE_CAL_CFG 0xB19
* CORE_CSR_CDC_DELAY_CFG 0x3AC
* CORE_CDC_OFFSET_CFG 0x0
* CORE_CDC_SLAVE_DDA_CFG 0x16334
*/
Perhaps we should just delete those comments because they're incorrect now.
Thanks for the review. Yes, I have addressed this comment on top of this
series along with one other fix.
-named ("mmc: sdhci-msm: Addresses minor cleanups")
Regards
Ritesh
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
