On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:15:17AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > I think we are missing a check for fatal_signal_pending in > iomap_file_buffered_write. This means that an oom victim can consume the > full memory reserves. What do you think about the following? I haven't > tested this but it mimics generic_perform_write so I guess it should > work.
Hi Michal, this looks reasonable to me. But we have a few more such loops, maybe it makes sense to move the check into iomap_apply?
