On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 1:19 AM, Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Would it be acceptable to use enum for the kernel internal representation (our
> e820_table structures never actually comes directly, we construct it
> ourselves),
> and maintain the very explicitly sized ABI type for the boot protocol only
> (i.e.
> uapi/asm/bootparam.h)?
I guess that would work, assuming that it doesn't cause unnecessary conversions.
Looking at the patch you sent out (assuming that's the complete deal),
it looks reasonable.
Linus
