Am 31.01.2017 um 16:53 schrieb Colin King: > From: Colin Ian King <[email protected]> > > Checking for ret < 0 is redundant because a previous check on ret > being non-zero already handles the ret < 0 case. Remove the redundant > code. Found by CoverityScan, CID#1398863, CID#1398864 > > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger <[email protected]> Thanks, //richard

