Hi Bjorn, I just came across a use case where I wanted to deal with optional regulators in bulk operations. I was about to submit a related patch when I saw that you submitted basically the same in 3ff3f518a135 "regulator: Make bulk API support optional supplies" and reverted it later stating that you misunderstood the API.
How does this extension break the API? To me it sounds like a neat feature. The only thing I can think of if that we have to assume that struct regulator_bulk_data is zero-initialized to ensure backwards-compatibility (use "normal" get as default). Rgds, Heiner
