On Wed, 2017-02-01 at 11:22 +1030, Andrew Jeffery wrote: > On Tue, 2017-01-31 at 15:50 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 5:24 AM, Andrew Jeffery <[email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > This is less straight-forward than one would hope, as some banks only > > > have 4 pins rather than 8, others are output only, yet more (W and > > > X, already supported) are input-only, and in the case of the g4 SoC bank > > > AC doesn't exist. > > > > > > Add some structs to describe the varying properties of different banks > > > and integrate mechanisms to deny requests for unsupported > > > configurations. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <[email protected]> > > > > > > --- > > > > > > Since v2: > > > > Patch applied with some patch -p1 < fuzz > > please check the result. >
*snip*
> Regardless, I'll try to recreate it myself and inspect the fuzz damage.
Ah, I think I see what's happened. I didn't send "gpio: aspeed: Make
bank names strings" again because you claimed you had applied v1 in the
v2 thread[1]. This patch doesn't fuzz when "gpio: aspeed: Make bank
names strings" has been applied, so is it possible that you tried
applying it to a tree missing "gpio: aspeed: Make bank names strings"?
$ git reset --hard gpio/for-next
HEAD is now at f334eae9c4e9 Merge branch 'devel' into for-next
$ git am
"/home/andrew/patches/[PATCH_v2_1_2]_gpio:_aspeed:_Make_bank_names_strings.mbox"
Applying: gpio: aspeed: Make bank names strings
$ git am
"/home/andrew/patches/[PATCH_v3]_gpio:_aspeed:_Add_banks_Y,_Z,_AA,_AB_and_AC.mbox"
Applying: gpio: aspeed: Add banks Y, Z, AA, AB and AC
$
Sorry for the confusion. What should I be doing when sending an updated
series where some of the patches have been applied? Send the whole
series regardless?
Andrew
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/1/26/334
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
