It is possible for dev_pm_opp_find_freq_exact() to return errors. It was all fine earlier as dev_pm_opp_get_voltage() had a check within it to check for invalid OPPs, but dev_pm_opp_put() doesn't have any similar checks and the callers need to make sure OPP is valid before calling them.
Also update the later dev_warn_ratelimited() to not print the error message as the OPP is guaranteed to be valid now. Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> --- drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c | 11 +++++++++-- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c index caaaeb3ac0f0..30d736289b87 100644 --- a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c +++ b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c @@ -431,13 +431,20 @@ static int get_static_power(struct cpufreq_cooling_device *cpufreq_device, opp = dev_pm_opp_find_freq_exact(cpufreq_device->cpu_dev, freq_hz, true); + if (IS_ERR(opp)) { + dev_warn_ratelimited(cpufreq_device->cpu_dev, + "Failed to find OPP for frequency %lu: %ld\n", + freq_hz, PTR_ERR(opp)); + return -EINVAL; + } + voltage = dev_pm_opp_get_voltage(opp); dev_pm_opp_put(opp); if (voltage == 0) { dev_err_ratelimited(cpufreq_device->cpu_dev, - "Failed to get voltage for frequency %lu: %ld\n", - freq_hz, IS_ERR(opp) ? PTR_ERR(opp) : 0); + "Failed to get voltage for frequency %lu\n", + freq_hz); return -EINVAL; } -- 2.7.1.410.g6faf27b
